Friday, 27 March 2009

ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE:
This article tells about the way how organization knowledge can be managed. Firstly it discusses about knowledge management and then how KMS supports to manage knowledge in an organization.

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT:

Knowledge management is a systematic process of capturing, creating, storing and applying knowledge in an organization. The knowledge can be effectively shared if only if there is a proper communication exists between the employees.

Knowledge management refers to a systematic and organizationally specified process of acquiring, organizing and communicating both tacit and explicit knowledge of employees so that other employees may make use of it to be more effective and productive in their work. As mentioned by Mryam & Dorothy (1999,p.2)

KMS SUPPORTING KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT:

The value for organizational knowledge is limited, if it is not properly shared. Any organizations ability to sustain in a competitive world depends on the ability to integrate and apply its knowledge assets of organizational members.

Traditionally, the creation and transfer of knowledge has occurred through various means like face to face communications, mentoring and staff development. As now a day’s markets are becoming global and organizations are moving to virtual forms, these traditional means prove to be slow and less effective. So, more efficient electronic means is necessary to support knowledge management in the organizations. Only computer systems can have a random effect at best to facilitate communication and information sharing.

As a result organizations are beginning to implement information systems which supports and enhance the organizational process of knowledge creation, storage, retrieval, transfer and application in organizations. Maier (cited in Kaldi, Aghaie & Khoshalan 2008)

These systems are referred as Knowledge management systems which help in managing knowledge in organizations. It creates a new working environment where knowledge and experience can be easily shared and also enables information and knowledge to emerge and flow to the right people at the right time so they can act more efficiently and effectively. Smith ( cited in Mostafa, Peyman, Mehdi & Mohammad 2007)

The following section can provide a clear idea on managing knowledge in NHS pharmacy department through KMS.

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE:

In NHS two approaches personalisation and codification are used to manage knowledge in it. In personalisation approach, workshop presentations, conferences, telecommunications and face to face interactions are used to share tacit and explicit knowledge among the organisational members. Where as in codification approach web 2.0 technologies such as RSS, WIKI’s, pharmacy space , podcasting and along with this meta data and tagging are used. The people who lacks IT skills use personalisation approach and others use the codification process.

This KM system acts as bridge for creating and sharing knowledge among the organisational members. During the conferences and workshop presentations people can know about new thing related to pharmacy sector and will share with fellow members through face to face interactions. They can put this information in wikis, podcasts through which others can connect to it. Pharmacy department can be configured to send an RSS feed about its current status and announcement. If any trouble is detected in the department, an update about the problem is sent to the users. In this way the knowledge is managed in NHS pharmacy department.

REFERENCES:

1. Maryam, A & Dorothy, L 1999, ‘Knowledge Management Systems: Emerging Views and Practices from the field’, system sciences, vol.7, pp. 1-8

2. Kaldi, A ,Aghaie, A & Khoshalhan, F 2008, ‘KMS Adoption in organizations’, industrial engineering & engineering management, pp. 37-41

3. Mostafa, F, Peyman, A, Mehdi, N & Mohammad, F 2007, ‘Iran aerospace industries’ KM approach based on a comparative study: a bench marking on successful practices’, Aircraft engineering and aerospace technology, vol. 79, pp. 69-79

9 comments:

  1. Hello Abhinay,

    Your heading "organisational KM", I cannot appear to see your perspective view on this rather than from the reflective reading material?...

    I agree to what you are saying in aspect of the "the value" but where you said "to sustain competitive world" depends on "knowledge assets", this is partially, but there are various other background elements as well.

    Another thing I would like to query is where you stated "organisations are beginning to implement 'information systems' - so what is your justification between a information system and a knowledge management system.. I see these two as different features.

    Also - "flow to right peeople at the right time" - are you aware of what the consequences of these are if not superseded?..

    Overall, I think this is good work and vastly improved from previous, but I would like to see you of have applied this to another organisation so that you can understand that it is not the same for every single firms out there. (Please do not take this personally - this is just to help you visualise other areas and not from one perspective!)

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. may be other background elements plays a role in the development of organization but the knowledge assets have best effect on it....don't you agree for this?......
    knowledge management system, it self is a IT based system....so, I think both are same....

    ReplyDelete
  3. In your abstract you say ”This article tells about the way how organization knowledge can be managed”….. I have doubts about your post about this… can you clear this up..?

    This is because you talk about KMS or KM…?

    However you do not mention how…? In personalised approach…?

    What stops knowledge sharing… what are the obstacles…for example: management, space, etc…?

    You need to be clear about what you are trying to discuss…!

    Good example… but is this on KMS…. (maybe wrong article..?)

    A lot room for improvements….

    \../

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with man-chie with her comments… and find your counter comments pointless… try and read the comments carefully and understand what it means…. Then respond to the comment …!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good work Abhi.. the way adopted KMS in the organisation seems good.

    you discussed about the people of organisation who lack IT skills using personalisaiton process. Is there any KMS for those kind of people to use the codification process to run the organisation efectively..?

    coming to the comments of Ravi, he's expecting an elaborated conceptual meaning of what you have said.

    keep up the hard work..!

    ReplyDelete
  6. A good example for manging knowlege in an organization.You have clearly explained codification and personaliation in the pharmacy department........

    I dont agree with ravis comments," I have doubts about your post ".......as you made it explicit.This is what i think.......

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello all team members,

    lovely to see you all here except (missing two)?

    Deepak - good analytical there - I agree with this "The people who lacks IT skills use personalisation approach and others use the codification process." but maybe it should be extended a bit more?...

    Prasad - your comment about Ravi - this is good, but Ravi will always have his doubts for the author to distinguish further clarity for justification.

    Is there anything else to challenge Abhinay? :)
    I would like to ...! (^___^)

    Abhinay - I have just noticed four things (1) you state "will share" - think of this on larger scale - does this mean everybody in the whole world will share what they know?... If so, where does that uniqueness come from?... [Remember.. each and everyone is different therefore have different viewpoints - i.e. morale ethical rights] (3) "systems can have a random effect" - can you describe this a bit more? .. to me I understood this that any random systems can appear out of the blue no where... (4) references.. please use them appropriately...?

    One last aspect, I would like to see what is your reflective view in the end after the readings and yet again refer to Aboubakr marking scheme.
    (**) where you said "pharmacy sector" - are you talking about internal or external?

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nice to see all The A-Team commenting, but is this because of the 5 marks or is it because your genuine interested... we see after today (Friday)...


    I be back with more...

    \ (-___-)/

    ReplyDelete